Drones have already been used on several occasions in the US to document the news. Last week, a storm chaser in Arkansas used a drone to record the havoc wrought by a tornado. But the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been very slow to adopt rules for private and corporate drone use and has taken a draconian zero-tolerance policy on its interim ban on almost all such uses. Now, a number of media companies, including The New York Times and The Associated Press, accused the Federal Aviation Authority of violating the First Amendment.
Is this a difficult problem? Sure! Just imagine a future city scape abuzz with irritating mechanical vultures — delivery owls and snoopy eye-spies, swooping about, colliding with buildings and each other and power lines, causing blackouts and raining shattered, glowing parts on all below… at minimum city use should involve devices capable of situational awareness and detection of collision hazards and minimum separation rules. But dig it – we will only get there if the experiments can proceed in a few cities to see what really happens!
Start with Houston. They don’t give a darn anyway….
== Drones, androids and robots bring you the news! ==
Will human journalists become obsolete? I participated in an online (HuffPost) panel discussion about the latest trend… robotizing the news media. Here are just a few examples of the trend.
Japan Unveils It’s First Android Newscaster. Not exactly uncanny, yet. But they’re busy. With an expected 7% drop in population, their interest in automation is very high.
AP Will Use Robots to Write Some Business Stories. – 4000 robo stories in the time it takes human writers to do 300.
Shades of Max Headroom! The following couch discussion of this is… fluffy and made me want to replace the panel with robots! Another News Outlet Is Using Robots To Write Stories…
Apparently most sports stories have come to us this way for several years. (I suspect decades, even generations.)
== And more drones… ==
Drones… everywhere! Illustrating what has sometimes been called Brin’s Corollary to Moore’s Law… that cameras get smaller, faster, cheaper, more numerous and more mobile faster than ML. Now… watch how the flying cams are getting far more rugged, using a simple gimbal in a cage approach! Watchbirds here we come, yippee.
Oh, but see the very end of this blog for one of the best links you’ll ever click, brought to you by a drone.
== The insurrectionary recourse? ==
All the ructions and revolutions overseas raise an earnest question: could it happen here? Dialing in closer: is it still even theoretically possible for a mass citizen uprising to topple the government of the modern, western state? Mr. Harry Bentham makes an earnest effort and raises a few interesting points in “Does Modern Tech Render the 2nd Amendment Redundant?”
Alas, his appraisal winds up being rather shallow, simply reiterating his arm-waved and evidence-free assertion that a mass uprising, armed with civilian rifles, could naturally and easily overcome forces of the modern state. Mr. Bentham leaves aside any discussion that:
– Any mass civil ruction will likely feature as many armed civilian “tories” as “rebels.”
– Local police have lately been heavily up-armed to close to military levels. Their loyalties in a crisis would complicate matters.
These and other factors were discussed in my own treatment on this issue — The Jefferson Rifle: Guns and the Insurrection Myth — where I appraise whether modern westerners — and Americans in particular — still retain an “insurrectionary recourse.”
And why attachment to that ideal is THE driver behind the refusal of the Gun Lobby to consider even modest compromises.