Farewell to Two Amazing Women

Two fantastic women departed from our sight on Earth last week, leaving it more barren than before.

Anne McCaffrey was my friend and colleague — a wonderful writer, deeply devoted to her craft, her fans, her civilization, and delivering wonder to millions.

I barely knew Lynn Margulis, who was no less gifted and no less a gift, having prodigious impact on the world of ideas and the advancement of science. Both were fascinating people, cultural icons and role models.

==Lynn Margulis==

Professor Lynn Margulis was instrumental in developing “endosymbiotic theory“… the incredible theory that our very cells derived out of the unification of many separate species that learned, through the harsh selective process of evolution, to work together for their common benefit.

Once a radical idea, it’s now widely accepted that the mitochondria inhabiting – and providing power to – the cells of eukaryotic metazoans like fish and mammals are descended from bacteria-like creatures that once lived independently, but somehow united through a process of symbiosis that became Margulis’s lifelong theme.  Other cellular organelles have since been proposed or accepted as having joined us through a process of incorporation that took a billion years.

This theme was taken to new levels when Margulis extended the early “Gaia Hypothesis” of James Lovelock… the notion that Earth’s biosphere shares many traits of a living organism, such as self-correcting feedback loops, synergistic behavior and overall optimization, as if it were in effect a living being.

That’s the “weak Gaia Hypothesis.” The strong version, which Margulis never proclaimed, would remove from my previous paragraph the words “if it were in effect.”

I made extensive use of Margulis ideas, performing riffs in my own work. Heart of the Comet explored possible implications of endosymbiotic theory. And it was impossible to avoid having great fun with both weak and strong versions of the Gaia Hypothesis in my novel Earth.  Both themes reappear in my forthcoming book, Existence.

What I admired most about Lynn Margulis was her bold willingness to always take a step back in order to encompass the wider context, the bigger picture.  Then an even bigger context, and so on.

==Anne McCaffrey==

Anne was a sweet lady who showed me great kindness whenever I visited her impossibly green farm in County Wicklow, Ireland.

I could reminisce further, but that would just be pointless bragging. So I’ll pay tribute to the colleague and writer who entertained and influenced millions.  One thing Anne did for me was to help distill what is the essence of my profession.  It happened one day when we were both being interviewed by a reporter, who referred to the famous McCaffrey “Dragons of Pern” books as “fantasy novels.”

Oh, how Anne bristled! With clenched restraint, she corrected the reporter:

“I don’t write fantasy. I am a science fiction author.

Now, a great many people have tried to define the difference between fantasy and SF.  Some try to explain it as a matter of past or future, or setting, or gimmicks and tools  (e.g. swords vs spaceships), or even the vast moral distinction between magic and science. And sure, one can grasp how some folks make lazy assumptions.  If it’s got dragons, well then, it must belong in the same category as Tolkien, right?

Anne dealt with that part of it swiftly. “My dragons were genetically engineered. Scientists designed them to help colonists save themselves from a terrible environmental threat.”

Hm, well. It’s not just the dragons. Most of Anne’s tales are filled with colorful things like tapestries and great stone castle holds, with much talk of weaving and herbal lore and fathom-deep traditions. There are duels and nobles and bards and songs and brave knights that are standard fare in your typical fantasy.  If you’re going to judge by superficialities, like the furniture, then it’s easy to see why some people make the mistake.

But here’s the real difference and it goes to the heart. The characters in the Pern stories dwell in a feudal setting, all right.  But unlike the endlessly repeated trope-protagonists in all those Tolkien-clone universes most of them don’t want to!

And they don’t intend to. Not for any longer than they must.

In the course of Anne McCaffrey’s fictional universe — as the stories unfold — people discover that things weren’t always this way – with peasant-serfs tied to the rocky land, wracked by filth, pestilence and arbitrary rule by hereditary lords, staring in occasional wonder at the great dragon-riders who protect them from raining death. Sure, their condition is eased by a myriad lovely traditions and crafts, reflecting the makeshift creativity of brave folk, improvising – making the best of things across centuries of darkness.

But during the span of many novels, they come to discover a core truth: that things could be better. That their civilization fell from a height so great that people once voyaged between stars, cured disease, pondered secrets of the universe… and even made dragons. And, as soon as they realize this, they start wanting to get all of those things back.

Anne’s characters know there’s something better than living in grimy ignorance and violence, even lightened by clever medieval arts. It will be a long climb back, but they itch to get their hands on flush toilets, movable type, computers, democracy. And one thing is certain – they are going to quit being feudal, just as soon as they can.

Oh, sure. Feudalism tugs at something deep within us. Those images of lords and secretive mages and so on resonate within us, because we’re all descended from the harems of guys who managed to pull off that trick! Anne certainly made good use of those resonating themes, and more power to her!  But her notion of the time flow of wisdom was always aimed forward, rooted in a love and belief in progress, in our ability to raise better generations, in a hope that better days will come.

She was a science fiction author. One of the best. And I’m proud to say she was my friend.

——

My condolences to Dorion Sagan, and to my esteemed colleague Todd McCaffrey, and to their families. Soar on.

4 Comments

Filed under science fiction

4 responses to “Farewell to Two Amazing Women

  1. Anne’s Pern series is by far the biggest influence on a very ambitious writing project I am tackling… I can’t honestly say that the world I am creating would be there if it weren’t for what she wrote. Shoulders of giants and all that. Also, I am right there with her annoyance at the fantasy label. I love me a good fantasy but Pern a fantasy? I actually frowned at the screen when I read that up there, even before I read her response.

  2. I would disagree that the residents of Pern were grimy and wanting tech to improve their lives like they had when the original colonists landed. it was always the intent of the landers to have an agrarian society on Pern. now, some things they wanted back, like printers and being able to hold their own land- that makes life a bit easier, but overall they were happy in their lot, I think.
    love your writing too, by the way!

  3. Until just now, here, I had no idea that Ann McCaffrey shucked her mortal coil. Now I (kinda) know how my uber Frank Zappa enamored pal felt when he first heard of Zappa’s death…months after it happened. McCaffrey and Ursula LeGuin are pretty much the literary grande dames of my sci-fi enamored youth.

    As for Dr Margulis. We have a parlor-game type banter-theory in my household, where “the mitochondria are in charge”. It’s where all of existence is pitched as a cellular level conspiracy carried out by the inscrutable cellular highjacking mitochondria. “Without the mitochondria, our cells would reap a max of 6 ATP (what cells use for energy) from a glucose molecule. But with the mitochondria? The cells pull up to 38 ATP from one glucose molecule” is presented as evidence/education. Throw in that we all get our mitochondria only from our mothers, and it’s a fun flight of fancy hereabouts, one that generally gets tagged a few times a year. It probably wouldn’t be as fun (if exist at all) without Lynn Margulis’ work.

    Time marches on…

  4. I don’t know whether it’s just me or if everyone else encountering issues with your site.

    It looks like some of the text within your posts are running off the screen.

    Can somebody else please comment and let me know
    if this is happening to them as well? This may be a
    problem with my browser because I’ve had this happen previously. Thank you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s